And it’s ignoring Proton’s alias type. Here’s what the alias type looks like when exported in JSON format:
{
"itemId": "<ITEM_ID>",
"shareId": "<SHARE_ID>",
"data": {
"metadata": {
"name": "<ALIAS_NAME>",
"note": "<ALIAS_NOTE>",
"itemUuid": "<ITEM_ID>"
},
"extraFields": [],
"type": "alias",
"content": {}
},
"state": 1,
"aliasEmail": "<ALIAS_EMAIL>",
"contentFormatVersion": 5,
"createTime": XXXXXXXXXX,
"modifyTime": XXXXXXXXXX,
"pinned": false
}
I know Bitwarden doesn’t officially provide an alias email service yet, but instead of ignoring it, Bitwarden could definitely handle this type of data as a Note:
- Name is the value of
<ALIAS_NAME>. - Note is the value of
<ALIAS_NOTE>. - Then create a custom field
Alias email(orEmaildepending on your preference), the value of<ALIAS_EMAIL>.
This would be very useful.