I agree with this — i.e., the priority for the added development capacity that could theoretically be acquired with a $10–$15 rate increase should definitely be bug fixes and quality assurance.
However, there at least several dozen popular feature requests that could significantly increase the quality-of-life for individual users, along with several low-hanging fruit (e.g., rewording a confusing error message) taht could be completed with minimal effort.
My general impression is that significant development effort is currently being invested in expansion of new features that benefit enterprise users, which makes sense if that development is underwritten by venture capital funding. However, if Bitwarden will potentially increase its annual revenue by a few million dollars by raising prices for individual Premium subscriptions (my guesstimate from above), then it seems only fair that such revenue (or a significant portion of it) should be invested in development resources that directly benefit those same individual Premium users (including implementation of new features requested by this customer base).
I’ve split the topic now.