I have worked 8 months as a MERN stack developer but now for past 6 months I am working as appsec engineer that lacks coding stuff.
To keep my JS coding skills fresh I wanted to contribute to some project and thought why not check bitwarden as I use it in daily life as well.
I observed clients repo includes JS code and can be a good place for me to spend time solving issues.
I have cloned the repo and installed the deps using npm i then I checked the directories e.g desktop, browser etc. I am willing to work on desktop version as its based on electron and I want to work on electron too. It doesnt mean I am not willing to work on browser or CLI, Ill move to them too.
The problem I am facing is setting up the project, I observed the package.json file in desktop project, there I ran npm run start, npm run build, npm run electron but it just build the app successfully and does not launch the app. I am getting the following output on running npm run electron:
webpack 5.73.0 compiled successfully in 24993 ms
[Main] Debugger listening on ws://127.0.0.1:5858/ee322ddf-03f9-4e68-b262-651da351e752
[Main] For help, see: https://nodejs.org/en/docs/inspector
[Rend] > @bitwarden/[email protected] build:renderer:watch
[Rend] > cross-env NODE_ENV=development webpack --config webpack.renderer.js --watch
[Main] (node:3564) DeprecationWarning: file property is deprecated and will be removed in v5.
[Main] (Use `electron --trace-deprecation ...` to show where the warning was created)
[Main] /home/cybersoldier/Documents/clients/node_modules/electron/dist/electron exited with signal SIGTRAP
[Main] electron --inspect=5858 ./build --watch exited with code 1
--> Sending SIGTERM to other processes..
[Rend] npm run build:renderer:watch exited with code SIGTERM
Can someone help me setting this project up and giving me some nudges, once I get go with this project, I plan to contribute heavily to it.
Thank you for your response. The link you shared helped me to build the desktop app successfully, don’t you think this should be included in repo’s contributing.md file so that its more approachable?
Secondly, I can only see 1 open issue of desktop labelled good first issue and that too I believe is taken. Let’s wait for some other good first issue to show up, meanwhile I want to understand the desktop codebase. Can you suggest me where should I start and how should I get familiar with the codebase?
Is there any other issue for beginner available in your hindsight?
Good to hear the instructions worked. That site is brand new, so we’re still in the process of adding it to the readme and contributing docs for all repos, so that users can find it.
I don’t have any specific recommendations for good first issues, as a team we’re trying to use that label more to help new contributors, but that’s still early days. I recommend you filter by desktop issues (Issues · bitwarden/clients · GitHub) and then just spend some time reviewing and sorting through what’s open, what you’re interested in, and what you feel is within your skill level to take on.