@dezo Welcome to the forum!
dezo:
How could any UX person ever think that default action - clicking anywhere on the entry should invoke entry editing, and not entry filling on the page. In the meantime Fill is a pretty small button on the right side (so everyone has to travel even bigger distance). Its like a programming guys, writing (editing) once, reading (filling) many times.
You can change that back to the old auto-fill behaviour by: Settings → Autofill → Click items to autofill on Vault view
dezo:
Cards usage is a horror. I was sad that Bitwarden can’t autofill many of the common payment gates here in Czechia, but I accepted it as sad reality of small market. Now you have improved it even more. I have to search for the card by name, or change the type combo, and after that I have to copy number, and cvv. God forbid if I’m not sure about the date. In addition, when Bitwarden window lose focus, I can start to search the card again. TXT file is more user friendly than this.
The cards and identities will (optionally) come back as categories in the auto-fill suggestions section (like it was in the old extension) as you can see in this announcement:
Here you can even see a preview of that in a short video:
main ← PM-17186
opened 12:03AM - 25 Jan 25 UTC
## 🎟️ Tracking
https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-17186
## 📔 Obje… ctive
This PR adds groups the autofill suggestions and adds sub headers for the identity and card types.
## 📸 Screenshots
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6c397cfc-1d4f-4f87-9c17-4f1b2d14a773
## ⏰ Reminders before review
- Contributor guidelines followed
- All formatters and local linters executed and passed
- Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
- Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
- Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
- CI builds passed
- Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
- Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team
## 🦮 Reviewer guidelines
- 👍 (`:+1:`) or similar for great changes
- 📝 (`:memo:`) or ℹ️ (`:information_source:`) for notes or general info
- ❓ (`:question:`) for questions
- 🤔 (`:thinking:`) or 💭 (`:thought_balloon:`) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
- 🎨 (`:art:`) for suggestions / improvements
- ❌ (`:x:`) or ⚠️ (`:warning:`) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
- 🌱 (`:seedling:`) or ♻️ (`:recycle:`) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
- ⛏ (`:pick:`) for minor or nitpick changes
