Another nice example for “declined”/“tabled”/“overruled/ignored" feature requests is this:
It was started in May 2020. In my opinion this “feature request” is simple to implement, it standardises the display of a credit card number across different devices/operating systems (e.g. MacOS ok, but not iOS), it helps to read the number, part of a better user experience and so on.
Yes, in May 2025 (five years after posting the initial post here in the Feature Request section) it appears on GitHub (I must say that GitHub is to complex for me, I am not a developer and I want to focus on this forum here), but there I mainly read something like “thank you for mentioning that! I’ve included the iOS behavior in our internal board for our engineering team to review.”
It is a “feature” (well, it is not a feature, it is a bug fix), which should have been implement already many years ago. I would understand a longer developing time for a feature like “tags”, but not for dividing the number in groups of four digits (as it already exists in Bitwarden for e.g. MacOS).
This example just shows that, in my opinion, the voting system is mainly another area in this forum to collect posts by users. Thats all. Because the developers of Bitwarden decide what (not) to do, no matter what users mention here in this forum (again: this is my impression). “Feature Requests” in this area can get old, very old, and grow a lot (by other, similar posts) …